Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. M/S. Voltas Ltd

High Court 29 Jan 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. M/S. Voltas Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. M/S. Voltas Ltd, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.In that view of the matter, the appeal is disposed of aswithdrawn. withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1724 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-8, Mumbai..Appellant Versus M/s. Voltas Ltd..Respondent ................... Mr. Sham Walve a/w Mr. Pritesh Chatterjee for the Appellant Mr. Sham Walve a/w Mr. Pritesh Chatterjee for the Appellant Ms. Jasmin Amalsadvala a/w Mr. Nishant Thakkar and RajeshPoojary i/by Mulla & Mulla for the Respondent Ms. Jasmin Amalsadvala a/w Mr. Nishant Thakkar and RajeshPoojary i/by Mulla & Mulla for the Respondent ................... CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 29, 2020. P.C.: 1.Heard Mr. Sham Walve, learned standing counsel,revenue for the appellant and Ms. Jasmin Amaladvala,learned counsel for the respondent - assessee. 2.On 15.1.2020, following order was passed:- " The learned counsel for the respondent pointed out that in theorder giving effect to the decision of the Tribunal relief granted by theTribunal has been mentioned and if the tax effect is so calculatedcomes below one crore. Learned counsel for the appellant seekstime to take instructions.Stand over to 29 January 2020." 3. Today, when the matter is called upon, Mr. Walvesubmits that he has received written instructions from Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax -8, Mumbai dated 27.1.2020 towithdraw the appeal as the tax effect involved is below theprescribed monetary limit as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019dated 8.8.2019. 4.In that view of the matter, the appeal is disposed of aswithdrawn. withdrawn. 5.Refund of court fees as per rules. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ] Digitallysigned byRavindraRavindra M.AmberkarM.Date:Amberkar2020.01.3015:41:30+0530
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan