Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8 v. Mis. Sojitzindia Pvt. Ltd.through:none
High Court
25 Sep 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8 v. Mis. Sojitzindia Pvt. Ltd.through:none
Date of order
25 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8 v. Mis. Sojitzindia Pvt. Ltd.through:none, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 28/2017, the present appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~55
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 857/2019
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – 8
..... Appellant
Through:Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior StandingCounsel.
versus
MIS. SOJITZINDIA PVT. LTD.Through:None.
..... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAO R D E R%25.09.2019
C.M. No.42972/2019 (exemption)
1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application stands disposed of.
ITA 857/2019 & C.M. No.42973/2019 (delay)
3. Learner counsel for the Appellant fairly does not dispute the fact that theissues raised in the present appeal are squarely cover by the decision of thisCourt in ITA No. 28/2017 dated 10.01.2017 in relation to the same assesseefor the subsequent assessment years namely, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11.The present appeal relates to assessment year 2007-08.Following thedecision in ITA No. 28/2017, the present appeal is dismissed.
4. In view of the aforesaid, the application for condonation of delay in re-
filing is not necessary to be considered on merits.
SEPTEMBER 25, 2019nk
VIPIN SANGHI, J
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue