Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 v. Sapient Consulting Ltd. (Erstwhile Sapient Corporation Pvt.ltd
High Court
24 May 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 v. Sapient Consulting Ltd. (Erstwhile Sapient Corporation Pvt.ltd
Date of order
24 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 v. Sapient Consulting Ltd. (Erstwhile Sapient Corporation Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
32.
+ ITA 341/2016
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -8
..... Appellant
Through Mr P. Roychaudhuri, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Lakshmi Gurung, Junior Standing Counsel.
versus
33.
+
SAPIENT CONSULTING LTD. (ERSTWHILE SAPIENT CORPORATION PVT.LTD.)
..... Respondent
Through Ms Kavita Jha, Advocate with Mr Aniket D. Agrawal, Advocate.
AND
ITA 342/2016
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8
..... Appellant
Through Mr P. Roychaudhuri, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Lakshmi Gurung, Junior Standing Counsel.
versus
SAPIENT CONSULTING LTD (ERSTWHILE SAPIENT CORPORATION PVT.LTD.) Through Ms Kavita Jha, Advocate with Mr Aniket D. Agrawal, Advocate.
..... Respondent
CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 24.05.2016
CM 20036/2016 (delay in filing the appeal) in ITA 341/2016CM 20037/2016 (delay in filing the appeal) in ITA 342/2016
ITA 341/2016 & 342/2016 Page 1 of 2
1. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay in filing the appeals is
condoned.
2. The applications are disposed of.
ITA 341/2016ITA 342/2016
3. In view of the decision of this Court in Spice Infotainment v. CIT (2012) 247
CTR 500 (Del) no substantial question of law arises. The appeals are
dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
MAY 24, 2016 pkv
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
ITA 341/2016 & 342/2016 Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.