Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -9, Mumbai v. Golden Tobacco Limited
High Court
05 Aug 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -9, Mumbai v. Golden Tobacco Limited
Date of order
05 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -9, Mumbai v. Golden Tobacco Limited, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: OfÏceobjections be removed within 4 weeks from today, failingwhich the Income Tax Appeal shall stand dismissed fordefault without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 485 OF 2019ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1745 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -9, Mumbai
.. Applicant
In the matter between
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -9, Mumbai
Vs
Golden Tobacco Limited
...................
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the ApplicantMr. Tejveer Singh for the Applicant
Mr. Sameer G. Dalal for the RespondentMr. Sameer G. Dalal for the Respondent
...................
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 5, 2019.
P.C.:
1.For the reasons set out in the afÏdavit in support of theNotice of Motion, the conditional order dated 27.9.2018passed by the Ld. Prothonotory and Senior Master is quashedand set aside. The Income Tax Appeal is restored to file aftercondonation of delay in filing this Notice of Motion. OfÏceobjections be removed within 4 weeks from today, failingwhich the Income Tax Appeal shall stand dismissed fordefault without further reference to the Court. The applicantshall pay cost of Rs. 10,000/- to the respondent, before thestage of admission.
2.The Notice of Motion is allowed on the above terms and
disposed of accordingly.
[ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue