Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. M/S W N S Mortgage Services Pvt Ltd
High Court
30 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. M/S W N S Mortgage Services Pvt Ltd
Date of order
30 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. M/S W N S Mortgage Services Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: CHAWLA % O R D E R30.01.2018 The question of law urged is whether the activity of the assessee in providing call centre services to its principals is eligible for deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Decision: In the above view of the matter, no substantial question of law arises; the appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~40
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
ITA 807/2017
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar with Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel.
versus
M/S W N S MORTGAGE SERVICES PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Nagi, Advocate.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
%
O R D E R30.01.2018
The question of law urged is whether the activity of the assessee in providing call centre services to its principals is eligible for deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer initially brought to tax but denied the benefit under Section 10A holding that call centre services did not amount to export of software. The CIT (A) accepted the assessee’s contention that software services were covered by virtue of Explanation 2 (b) to Section 10A. The CBDT’s Notification No.890 (E) issued on 26.09.2000 expressly notifies call centres as activities covered by the Explanation.
Having regard to these facts, the ITAT confirmed the order of ITA 807/2017 Page 1 of 2
the CIT (A).
This Court has considered a similar issue in CIT v. Kiran Kapoor, 372 ITR 321 (Del.). Likewise in respect of the same assessee for the subsequent year - AY 2007-08 - the Court confirmed the view of the ITAT (ITA 91/2018, dated 29.01.2018). The Court is also cognizant of Section 10A, particularly Explanation 2, which in its material particulars define computer software as follows: -
(a)Any computer program recorded on any disc, tape, perforated media or other information storage device or” perforated media or other information storage device or”
(b)Any customized electronic data or any product or service of similar nature. similar nature.
In the above view of the matter, no substantial question of law arises; the appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
The date previously fixed is hereby recalled/cancelled.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
JANUARY 30, 2018 /vikas/
A. K. CHAWLA, J
ITA 807/2017
Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue