Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Valvoline Cummins Pvt Ltd
High Court
06 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Valvoline Cummins Pvt Ltd
Date of order
06 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Valvoline Cummins Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~23
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 393/2018, C.M. APPL.12970/2018
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9 ..... Appellant
Through : Sh. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel.
versus
VALVOLINE CUMMINS PVT LTD.
..... Respondent
Through : Ms. Kavita Jha, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
O R D E R% 06.04.2018
The Revenue is aggrieved by the extension of stay beyond the period of 365 days, granted by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
(ITAT).
The Court is of the opinion that this issue is covered against the Revenue’s in the judgment reported as Pepsi Foods Private Limited v. ACIT 376 ITR 87.
The appeal lacks merit. It is accordingly dismissed along with the pending application.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
APRIL 06, 2018/AJK
A. K. CHAWLA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue