Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax- 9 v. Ver...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax- 9 v. Vertex Customer Services India Pvt. Ltd

High Court 24 May 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax- 9 v. Vertex Customer Services India Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
24 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax- 9 v. Vertex Customer Services India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 418/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 9 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel versus VERTEX CUSTOMER SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 24.05.2017 CM No. 20012/2017 1. For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed. The delay of 185 days in filing the appeal is condoned. ITA No. 418/2017 2. This is an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the Assessee against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 5[th] May, 2016 in ITA No. 25/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2008-09. 3. The issue raised in this petition concerns the exclusion of comparables for the purpose of determining the arm’s length price of the international transactions involving the Assessee for the AY in question. The issue stands covered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee by the judgment in Rampgreen Solutions Pvt. Ltd. V. Commissioner of Income Tax, [2015] 377 ITR 533 (Del). The issue of exclusion of Infosys as a comparable stands covered stands covered against the Revenue of CIT v. Agnity India Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (2013) 262 CTR 291(Del). 4. The Court, therefore, does not find any substantial question of law arising from the impugned order of the ITAT which requires examination. 5. The appeal is dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J MAY 24, 2017 tp CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan