Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Address:...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Address: Udaipur v. By The Court

High Court 19 Dec 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Address: Udaipur v. By The Court
Date of order
19 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Address: Udaipur v. By The Court, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.The instant appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgmentof this Court given in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax,Udaipur Vs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FORRAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. .. D.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 53 / 2016. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Address: Udaipur ----Appellant Versus Smt. Tammna Begum Legal Heir of Late Mohd. Sher Khan,Address: Prop. M/s Progressive Enterprises, Khawja Bagh, VPOSawa Chittorgarh ----Respondent __________________________________________________ For Appellant :Mr. K.K. Bissa __________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MAHESHWARI Judgment / Order 19/12/2016 BY THE COURT: 1.Precisely the issue involved in the instant appeal is thatwhether the assessee has been rightly declared entitled by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to have depreciation as per Appendix-I to theIncome Tax Act, 1962 for the cost incurred in civil work,installation of electrical items and in installation of powerevacuation while establishing wind mills ? 2.This Court in D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 14/2013“Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur Vs. M/s K.K. /Mohan/38 Enterprises, Udaipur” has already examined the issue forarriving at the conclusion that such depreciation is admissible. 3.The instant appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgmentof this Court given in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax,Udaipur Vs. M/s K.K. Enterprises, Udaipur (supra) decided on18[th] July, 2014. (DEEPAK MAHESHWARI),J. (GOVIND MATHUR),J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan