Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v....

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. M/S Anant Syntex Ltd., H Post Box

High Court 26 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

26 Nov 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. M/S Anant Syntex Ltd., H Post Box, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, this appeal is also dismissed in light of order dated6.2.18 passed in D.B.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 99/2017 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer. ----Appellant Versus M/s Anant Syntex Ltd., H Post Box No. 107,village Gathila Khera,Chittor Road, Bhilwara (Rajasthan). ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. K.K. Bissa, Mr. G.S. ChouhanFor Respondent(s): Mr. Vikas Balia, Mr. Pramod Vyas HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA 26/11/2018 Order This appeal is directed against the common order dated 10.7.17passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench (‘ITAT’),Jodhpur in ITA No.123/Jodh/2017 and ITA No.198/Jodh/2017. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that anappeal arising out of common order dated 10.7.17 passed by the ITATin ITA No.198/Jodh/2017 being D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.100/17already stands dismissed by this Court vide order dated 6.2.18 andtherefore, this appeal also deserves to be dismissed in light of saidorder. Accordingly, this appeal is also dismissed in light of order dated6.2.18 passed in D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.100/17. (DINESH MEHTA),J 38-Vij/- (SANGEET LODHA),J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.