Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v....

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. M/S Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Plot

High Court 07 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. M/S Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Plot
Date of order
07 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. M/S Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Plot, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 2/2019 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer ----Appellant Versus M/s Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Plot No. 2343, 2NdFloor Vaishali Nagar Ajmer ----Respondent Connected With D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 3/2019 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer ----Appellant Versus M/s Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Plot No. 2343, 2NdFloor Vaishali Nagar Ajmer ----Respondent For Appellant(s) For Appellant(s) : Mr. Shantanu Sharma Mr. Anurag MathurFor Respondent(s): Mr. Dinesh Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 07/11/2024 1.The tax effect in appeals is below Rupees Two Crores, in view ofthe circular of Central Board of Direct Taxes dated 17.09.2024, learnedcounsel for appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeals. 2.The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. 3.The formulated substantial questions of law are kept open. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan