Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v....

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. M/S Shree Cement Limited, Bangur Nagar, Post Box

High Court 17 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. M/S Shree Cement Limited, Bangur Nagar, Post Box
Date of order
17 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. M/S Shree Cement Limited, Bangur Nagar, Post Box, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of above, present appeal is dismissed in thelight of aforesaid instruction.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Income Tax Appeal No. 291/2018 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer ----Appellant Versus M/s Shree Cement Limited, Bangur Nagar, Post Box No. 33,Beawar, Rajasthan 305901 ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Ms. Parinitoo Jain. For Respondent(s): Mr. Anant Kasliwal. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 17/10/2019 Learned counsel for the appellant has placed before thisCourt a copy of the instructions dated 08[th] August, 2019, issued infurtherance of the Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 of theCentral Board of Direct Taxes (the Board) and its amendmentdated 20[th] August, 2018 vide which monetary limits for filing ofincome tax appeals by the Department before Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/appeals before theSupreme Court have been specified. Para 2 of the instructionsdated 8[th] August, 2019, mentions that as a step towards furthermanagement of litigation, it has been decided by the Board thatmonetary limits for filing of appeals in income-tax cases beenhanced further through amendment in Para 3 of the Circularmentioned above and accordingly, the table for monetary limitsspecified in Para 3 of the Circular shall read as follows:- Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the monetary limit in this appeal is less than the prescribed amount. In view of above, present appeal is dismissed in thelight of aforesaid instruction. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J MANOJ NARWANI /117
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan