Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax , Ajmer v. M/S Starnet Business Ltd. , 1St Floor, Sangan Tower, Gandhinagar, Bhilwara
High Court
27 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax , Ajmer v. M/S Starnet Business Ltd. , 1St Floor, Sangan Tower, Gandhinagar, Bhilwara
Date of order
27 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax , Ajmer v. M/S Starnet Business Ltd. , 1St Floor, Sangan Tower, Gandhinagar, Bhilwara, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 66/2018
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax , Ajmer.
----Appellant
Versus
M/s Starnet Business Ltd. , 1St Floor, Sangan Tower, GandhiNagar, Bhilwara.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. K.K. BissaFor Respondent(s):
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
27/07/2018
Order
It is stated that the tax effect in the case would beRs.28,71,638/-.
As per Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 vide instructionNo.3 monetary limit for proceedings in High Court isRs.50,00,000/- and vide para No.13, the circular appliesretrospectively to pending appeals and cross-objections as alsoreferences. Thus, as per the Circular No.3/2018, the instantappeal is not to be prosecuted by the appellant.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
(NIRMALJIT KAUR),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.