Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner,...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner, Bikaner v. M/S Bombay Builder, Near Jhawar Bus Stand, Nh-11,Sridungargarh, Bikaner

High Court 10 Jul 2023 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

10 Jul 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner, Bikaner v. M/S Bombay Builder, Near Jhawar Bus Stand, Nh-11,Sridungargarh, Bikaner, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 39/2019 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner, Bikaner ----Appellant Versus M/s Bombay Builder, Near Jhawar Bus Stand, Nh-11,Sridungargarh, Bikaner ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. K.K. Bissa.For Respondent(s): --- HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 10/07/2023 As per the settled law there being a concurrent finding givenby the ITAT and CIT(A) no appeal would lie on facts, that apart wedo not find any question of law which would arise for considerationin the present case. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH),CJ 55-a.asopa/-

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.