Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner v. Connected With
High Court
16 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner v. Connected With
Date of order
16 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner v. Connected With, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 161/2017
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner
----Appellant
Versus
Smt. Deepika Jain
----Respondent
Connected With
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 155/2017
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, BikanerVersus
----Appellant
Sriganganagar Zila Dugdh Utpadak SahakarD.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 156/2017Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner
----Respondent
----Appellant
Versus
Sriganganagar Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakar
----Respondent
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 157/2017Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner
----Appellant
Versus
Sriganganagar Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakar
----Respondent
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 158/2017Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner
----Appellant
Versus
Smt. Kalpana Jain
----Respondent
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 38/2018Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner
----Appellant
Versus
Sriganganagar Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakar
----Respondent
For Appellant(s)
For Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
16/07/2018
Order
As per Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 vide instructionNo.3 monetary limit for proceedings in High Court isRs.50,00,000/- and vide para No.13, the circular appliesretrospectively to pending appeals and cross-objections as alsoreferences. Thus, as per the Circular No.3/2018, the instantappeals are not to be prosecuted by the appellant.
The appeals are accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
(NIRMALJIT KAUR),J
Praveen/30-35
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue