In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-11 … v. Shantivijay Jewels Ltd. …, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: 17 of 2019 dated 8 August 2019and instructions have been received to withdraw the Appeal.Accordingly, the Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1998 OF 2019
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central-11… AppellantVs.Shantivijay Jewels Ltd.… Respondent
… Respondent
…........
Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for the Appellant.Mr. A.K. Jasani for the Respondent.
…........
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 18 DECEMBER 2019
P.C.:-
Learned counsel for the Appellant states that the taxeffect involved in this Appeal is below the threshold limit of Rs.1crore as provided in Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 8 August 2019and instructions have been received to withdraw the Appeal.Accordingly, the Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 2.Refund of Court Fees as per rules.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.)
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
DikshaDigitallysigned byDikshaRaneRaneDate:2019.12.1917:27:48+0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue