Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2 Mumbai v. M/S. Mantri Properties Pvt. Ltd
High Court
25 Jul 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2 Mumbai v. M/S. Mantri Properties Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
25 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
2009-2010
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2 Mumbai v. M/S. Mantri Properties Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.The Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Shridhar Sutar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 568 OF 2015
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-2 Mumbai
… Appellant
Versus
M/s. Mantri Properties Pvt. Ltd.
… Respondent
…..
Mr. P.A. Narayanan a/w Mr. Abhay Ahuja for the Appellant.
…..
CORAM :S. V. GANGAPURWALA ANDA. M. BADAR, JJ.
P. C. :
DATE :25th JULY, 2017
1.This appeal relates to Assessment Year 2009-2010.
2.The learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs and as per the CBDT Circular No.21 of 2015 dated 10[th] December, 2015, the Department has taken a policy decision not to prosecute the appeals wherein the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lakhs.
3.In the light of the above, the learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal.
4.The Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
5.Needless to state that the question of law raised is kept open.
6.The Court Fees as per Rules, be refunded.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
(S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.