Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Central-2 v. Arti Chadha And Puja Chadha
High Court
13 Jan 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Central-2 v. Arti Chadha And Puja Chadha
Date of order
13 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Central-2 v. Arti Chadha And Puja Chadha, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
25.
+ ITA 72/2016
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(CENTRAL-2)
... Appellant
Through: Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Senior Standing counsel with Ms. Vibhuti, Advocate.
versus
ARTI CHADHA AND PUJA CHADHA .... Respondent
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
%
O R D E R13.01.2016
CM No. 1092/2016 (for exemption)
1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application is disposed of.
-CM No. 1093/2016 (for condonation of delay in refiling the appeal)
3. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in re-filing of the
appeal is condoned.
4. The application is disposed of.
ITA No. 72/2016
ITA 72/2016
5. It is stated by Ms Suruchi Aggarwal, Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue, that in light of the Circular No. 24/2015 dated 31[st] December, 2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on the subject “Recording of satisfaction note under Section 158BD/153C of the Act”, this appeal is not pressed.
6. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J
JANUARY 13, 2016/dn
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
ITA No. 72/2016
Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue