Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2 v. M/S Passionate Investments Management Pvt. Ltd
High Court
08 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2 v. M/S Passionate Investments Management Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
08 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2 v. M/S Passionate Investments Management Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Ladda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 977 of 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-2..Appellant.VsM/s Passionate InvestmentsManagement Pvt. Ltd...Respondent.
..Respondent.
Ms. Padma Divakar, Advocate for the Appellant.Mr. Atul Jasani, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATED :- 8TH JANUARY, 2019.
P.C.:
1The Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal”for short)Following question of law is presented for our consideration:-
Whether on the facts and in circumstances of thecase and in law, the order of the Tribunal was justified inupholding the decision of the learned CIT (A) that theprofit from sale of investment has to be under the head'Capital Gains' instead of 'business income' withoutappreciating that the Assessee is a Trader and not anInvestor as can be ascertained by the AO in itsAssessment order?”
2The learned Counsel for the appellant pointed outthat the identical issue came before this Court in the IncomeTax Appeal No. 2345 of 2013 and connected appeal. The appealwas dismissed by a detailed order dated 27[th] June, 2016.Without recording separate reasons this appeal is alsodismissed.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.