Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Nagar Dairy Pvt. Ltd

High Court 13 Jul 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Nagar Dairy Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
13 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Nagar Dairy Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Issue: The moot point which arose for consideration before the Tribunal was, whether additions could be made where incriminating material was not found for the Assessment Year in issue.

Decision: Accordingly, the above-captioned appeal is disposed of, in the terms of our decision rendered in the aforementioned ITAs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Signature Not Verified $~92 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:13.07.2023 + ITA 367/2023 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms Easha Kadian and Hemlata Rawat, Advs. versus NAGAR DAIRY PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: (ORAL) CM No.34966/2023 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM No. 34965/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant/revenue seeking condonation of delay of 14 days in re-filing the appeal] 2. This is an application moved on behalf of the appellant/revenue seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal. 2.1 According to the appellant/revenue, there is a delay of 14 days in re-filing the appeal. 3. For the reasons given in the application, the delay is condoned. 4. Accordingly, the application is disposed of. ITA 367/2023 5. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10. 6. The appellant/revenue seeks to assail the order of the Income Tax Tribunal [in short, “Tribunal”] dated 23.11.2022. 7. Mr Sanjay Kumar, learned senior standing counsel, who appears on behalf of the appellant/revenue informs us that the issue raised in the present appeal is covered by the decision dated 01.06.2023 rendered by this Court in ITA No. 332/2023, ITA No. 323/2023 & ITA No. 327/2023. 8. The moot point which arose for consideration before the Tribunal was, whether additions could be made where incriminating material was not found for the Assessment Year in issue. The Tribunal in this regard has ruled against the appellant/revenue. 9. This very similar issue arose in the aforementioned appeals as well, where we have ruled that no substantial question arises for our consideration. 10. Accordingly, the above-captioned appeal is disposed of, in the terms of our decision rendered in the aforementioned ITAs. RAJIV SHAKDHER JUDGE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGE JULY 13, 2023/RY Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan