Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Nagar Dairy Pvt. Ltd

High Court 05 Jul 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Nagar Dairy Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
05 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Nagar Dairy Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Signature Not Verified $~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 05.07.2023 + ITA 343/2023 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Easha Kadian and Ms Hemlata Rawat, Advocates. versus NAGAR DAIRY PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: (ORAL) CM APPL. 33435/2023 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 33436/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant/revenue seeking condonation of delay of 14 days in filing the appeal] 2. This is an application moved on behalf of the appellant/revenue seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2.1 According to Mr Sanjay Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel who appears on behalf of the appellant/revenue, there is a delay of 14 days. 3. Having regard to the period of delay involved, we are inclined to condone the delay in filing the appeal. 4. The prayer made in the application is allowed. The delay is, accordingly, condoned. 5. The application is disposed of, in the aforesaid terms. ITA 343/2023 6. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2006-07. 7. The appellant/revenue seeks to assail the order dated 22.11.2022 passed by the ITA 343/2023 Pg. 1 of 2 Signature Not Verified Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, “Tribunal”] in ITA No. 5470/Del/2015. 8. Mr Kumar informs us that the issue raised in the instant appeal stands covered by the decision rendered by this court on 01.06.2023 in ITA No. 321/2023, 324/2023 and 325/2023. 8.1 To be noted, in the said order, we had recorded that the issue raised was covered by a judgment of a coordinate bench of this court rendered in CIT vs. RRJ Securities Ltd. 380 ITR 612. 9. Therefore, having regard to the aforesaid, no substantial question of law arises for our consideration. our consideration. 10. The appeal is, accordingly, closed. 11. The Registry will dispatch the copy of the order passed today to the respondent/assessee via all modes including email. respondent/assessee via all modes including email. 12. Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order. (RAJIV SHAKDHER) JUDGE (GIRISH KATHPALIA) JUDGE JULY 5, 2023/v Click here to check corrigendum, if any ITA 343/2023 Pg. 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan