In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-2 v. Parekh Aluminex Ltd, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Urmila IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 824 OF 2019ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 657 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central-2Vs.Parekh Aluminex Ltd.
… Applicant
… Respondent
Mr.P.A. Narayanan for the Applicant.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 19 DECEMBER, 2019.
P. C. :.Learned Counsel for the Applicant – Revenue at the outsettenders unconditional apology for not remaining present when thematter was called out. Considering the apology so tendered, the orderdismissing the Appeal for default on 6 June 2019 is recalled.
2.Place the Appeal on board as per its turn.
3.Notice of Motion is allowed & disposed of as such.
[M. S. KARNIK, J.] [NITIN JAMDAR, J.]
1/1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue