Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Rama Allied Products Marketing Pvt. Ltd
High Court
31 Jul 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Rama Allied Products Marketing Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
31 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Rama Allied Products Marketing Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~2 & 3
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 326/2024 + ITA 327/2024
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2
.....Appellant
Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, SSC with Ms. Monica Benjamin, JSC and Ms. Easha, JSC.
versus
RAMA ALLIED PRODUCTS MARKETING PVT. LTD.
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Somil Agarwal, Adv. (VC), Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Mr. Dushyant Agarwal, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARO R D E R31.07.2025
%
1. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate, appearing for the appellant/revenue states that as the Tax effect in these appeals is less than Rs.2 crores as is clear from paragraph no. 4 of the affidavit at pages 20-21, he shall not press these appeals.
2. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
JULY 31, 2025 acm
VINOD KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.