Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Sh. Nirmal Kumar Minda

High Court 09 Nov 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Sh. Nirmal Kumar Minda
Date of order
09 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Sh. Nirmal Kumar Minda, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Signature Not Verified $~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decision delivered on: 09.11.2023 + ITA 617/2023 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus SH. NIRMAL KUMAR MINDA ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL): CM APPL. 58379/2023 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. ITA 617/2023 2. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19. 3. Via the instant appeal, the appellant/revenue seeks to assail the order dated 03.05.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, “Tribunal”]. 4. Mr Sanjay Kumar, learned senior standing counsel, who appears on behalf of appellant/revenue, says that the issue which arises in the instant appeal also obtains in the respondent’s/assessee’s appeal in ITA No. 616/2023. 5. Via the decision dated 08.11.2023 passed in ITA No. 616/2023, we had closed the appellant’s/revenue’s appeal, as according to us no substantial questions of law arose for our consideration. had closed the appellant’s/revenue’s appeal, as according to us no substantial questions of law arose for our consideration. 6. Since the issues in the instant appeal are the same, an identical result will follow. will follow. 7. Accordingly, the appeal is closed. 8. Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order. RAJIV SHAKDHER JUDGE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGE NOVEMBER 09, 2023/RY Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan