Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3, Mumbai v. Bharuch Enviro Infrastructure Ltd
High Court
28 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3, Mumbai v. Bharuch Enviro Infrastructure Ltd
Date of order
28 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3, Mumbai v. Bharuch Enviro Infrastructure Ltd, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Y.S.Patil
1 11-ITXA-432-2018.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 432 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income TaxCentral-3, Mumbai
… Appellant
VersusBharuch Enviro Infrastructure Ltd.
… Respondent
*******
Mr. Ashok Kotangle with Mr. P.A. Narayanan and Mr. Ajay V.Anand, for the Appellant.Ms. Vasanti Patel, for the Respondent.
*******
CORAM:DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR ANDABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE : 28[th] JULY, 2022
P.C.:
1.Learned Counsel for the Respondent had taken a preliminaryobjection to maintainability of the present appeal on the question ofjurisdiction.
2.It can be seen that the order dated 27 February 2017 was
passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad.Therefore, this Court would not have jurisdiction over the matter.
3.Be that as it may; the present appeal held is not maintainable
Digitallysigned byYUGANDHARAYUGANDHARASHARADSHARADPATILPATILDate:2022.07.2912:35:21+0530
Y.S.Patil
2 11-ITXA-432-2018.odt
on the issue of jurisdiction. The Appellant is at liberty to approachthe Gujarat High Court.
4.The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.