Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-3, New Delhi v. Rajiv Kumar
High Court
13 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-3, New Delhi v. Rajiv Kumar
Date of order
13 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-3, New Delhi v. Rajiv Kumar, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: These appeals are consequently dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~59 & 61 to 68
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 338/2018
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-3, NEW DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SSC with Mr. Apoorv Agarwal and Mr. Parth Semwal, JSCs with Ms. Nupur Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Bhanukaran Singh, Ms. Muskaan Goel, Mr. Himanshu Gaur and Mr. Kamakshraj Singh, Advs. NEW DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SSC with Mr. Apoorv Agarwal and Mr. Parth Semwal, JSCs with Ms. Nupur Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Bhanukaran Singh, Ms. Muskaan Goel, Mr. Himanshu Gaur and Mr. Kamakshraj Singh, Advs.
versus
RAJIV KUMAR
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Somil Agarwal and Mr. Dushyant Agarwal, Advs. Dushyant Agarwal, Advs.
61
+ ITA 383/2018
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(EXEMPTIONS)
.....Appellant Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC with Ms. Anuja Pethia, JSC with Ms. Anu Priya Nisha Minz and Mr. Srikant Singh, Advs. Ms. Anuja Pethia, JSC with Ms. Anu Priya Nisha Minz and Mr. Srikant Singh, Advs.
versus
APARNA ASHRAM
.....Respondent
Through: None.
62
+ ITA 384/2018
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(EXEMPTIONS)
.....Appellant
Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC with Ms. Anuja Pethia, JSC with Ms.
Anu Priya Nisha Minz and Mr. Srikant Singh, Advs.
versus
APARNA ASHRAM
Through: None.
.....Respondent
63
+ ITA 385/2018
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(EXEMPTIONS)
.....Appellant Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC with Ms. Anuja Pethia, JSC with Ms. Anu Priya Nisha Minz and Mr. Srikant Singh, Advs.
versus
APARNA ASHRAM
Through:
None.
.....Respondent
64
+ ITA 386/2018
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(EXEMPTIONS)
.....Appellant Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC with Ms. Anuja Pethia, JSC with Ms. Anu Priya Nisha Minz and Mr. Srikant Singh, Advs.
Through:
versus
APARNA ASHRAM
.....Respondent
Through:
None.
65
+ ITA 390/2018 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(EXEMPTIONS)
.....Appellant
Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC with Ms. Anuja Pethia, JSC with Ms. Anu Priya Nisha Minz and Mr. Srikant Singh, Advs.
versus
APARNA ASHRAM
.....Respondent
Through: None.
66
+ ITA 408/2018 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(EXEMPTIONS)
.....Appellant Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC with Ms. Anuja Pethia, JSC with Ms. Anu Priya Nisha Minz and Mr. Srikant Singh, Advs.
versus
APARNA ASHRAM
.....Respondent
Through: None.
67
+ ITA 434/2018
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC with Mr. Ashvini Kumar and Mr. Rishabh Nangia, JSCs
versus
MAYAR INDIA LTD
.....Respondent
Through: None.
68
+ ITA 478/2018
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, SSC.
versus
ADI BPO SERVICES LTD.
.....Respondent
Through:
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
O R D E R
%
13.12.2024
Undisputedly, the tax effect which forms subject matter of these appeals falls below INR 2 crores and they would thus not be liable to be continued in light of the provisions made in Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17 September 2024.
These appeals are consequently dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
DECEMBER 13, 2024/RW
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.