In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-3 v. Suresh Janardan Raut, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Urmila IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 840 OF 2019
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3177 OF 2019
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-Central-3
… Applicant
Vs.Suresh Janardan Raut
… Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Applicant.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 19 DECEMBER, 2019.
P. C. :
Learned Counsel for the applicant points out that the mainAppeal has been withdrawn with respect to tax effect stipulated in theconcerned Circular and Notice of Motion for condonation of delay hasremained pending which has become infructuous.
2.Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of as infructuous.
[M. S. KARNIK, J.] [NITIN JAMDAR, J.]
UrmilaDigitally signedby Urmila P.P.IngleDate:2019.12.20Ingle18:12:15 +0530
1/1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue