Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. M/S Heera Moti Spices Pvt. Ltd
High Court
13 Dec 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. M/S Heera Moti Spices Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
13 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. M/S Heera Moti Spices Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH CQURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARE
109
Income Tax Appeal No.416 of 2017Date of decision: December 13, 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon
...Appellant
Versus
M/s Heera Moti Spices Pvt. Ltd.
...Respondent
CORAM:HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
'''''
Present:Mr. Rajesh sethi, Sr. standing Counsel withMr. Arun Biriwal, Advocate,
Mr. Tushar Gera, Advocate and)Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Aavocate for the appellant.
''''''
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.(Oral)
1.Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant-Revenue states that since the tax effect Involved Is“1,83,965/-, he hasinstructions to withdraw the present appeal in view of the circularNo.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 issued by the C.B.D.1T., New Delni.However, he prayed that liberty be granted to the revenue to file anapplication for revival of the appeal in case something survives therein.2D.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It Is,nowever, clarified that witharawal of the appeal by the revenue shall notbe taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, thelegal issue as claimed by the revenue is being left open to beadjudicated in an appropriate case.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
December 13, 2017
sonia gugnanl
(AMIT RAWAL)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No
Whether reportable?
Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.