Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. M/S Hindustan Syringes & Medical Devices Ltd

High Court 03 May 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. M/S Hindustan Syringes & Medical Devices Ltd
Date of order
03 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. M/S Hindustan Syringes & Medical Devices Ltd, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 188 of 2017 Decided on : 03.05.2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon Versus M/s Hindustan Syringes & Medical Devices Ltd. . . . Appellant . . . Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Arun Biriwal, Advocate and Ms. Varinder Kaur Warraich, Advocatefor the appellant-revenue.for the appellant-revenue. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the tax effect involved is ` 16,93,814/-, therefore, he may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal in view of the circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 issued by the C.B.D.T., New Delhi. However, he prayed that liberty be granted to the revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case something survives therein. 2.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is, however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not be taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legal issue as claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE May 03, 2017 J.Ram Jawala Ram2017.05.05 14:04Whether speaking/reasoned:Yes/NoI attest to the accuracy andI attest to the accuracy andauthenticity of this documentWhether Reportable:Yes/NoChandigarhChandigarh (RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan