Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Prabhu Dayal Memorial Religious & Educationalassociation, Jhajjar
High Court
22 Nov 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Prabhu Dayal Memorial Religious & Educationalassociation, Jhajjar
Date of order
22 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Prabhu Dayal Memorial Religious & Educationalassociation, Jhajjar, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
YOGESH SHARMA2019.11.26 11:13I attest to the accuracy andintegrity of this document
208-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
ITA-372-2016 (O&M)Date of decision : 22.11.2019
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon
Versus
Prabhu Dayal Memorial Religious & EducationalAssociation, Jhajjar
... Appellant
... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present:Mr. Karan Kaushik, Advocate for
Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent. ****
AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL)
1.Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since thetax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed in CircularNo.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes,further amended vide Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 read with
Letter No.F.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated 20.08.2019, he hasinstructions to withdraw the present appeal. However, he prayed that libertybe granted to the appellant-revenue to file an application for revival of theappeal, in case something survives therein.
2.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
3.Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending C.M.Application, if any, also stands disposed of.
( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE
22.11.2019 Yogesh Sharma
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable
( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE
Yes/ NoYes/ No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.