Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Shri H.s.chadha
High Court
18 Mar 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Shri H.s.chadha
Date of order
18 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Shri H.s.chadha, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAATCHANDIGARH
CM No. 2687-CI1[-2016 in/andITA No. 363 of 2015 (O&M)Decided on : 18.03.2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon
.. Appellant
Versus
Shri H.S.Chadha
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG
PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Sr. Standing counsel withMs. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Advocatefor the appellant.Mr. B.M.Monga, Advocatefor the applicant-respondent.
----
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Notice of this application.
2.At the asking of the Court, Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Advocate, acceptsnotice on behalf of the non-applicant/appellant.
3,At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties the main case istaken up for today.
4Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the taxeffect involved in the present case is=12,50,000/-, he has instructions to withdrawthe present appeal in view of the circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 issued bythe C.B.D.T., New Delhi. However, he prayed that liberty be granted to therevenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case something survivestherein|
5,Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is, however,clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not be taken to beaffirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legal issue as claimedby the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
March 18, 2016smritl
(RAJ RAHUL GARG)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.