Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Shri Roop Bansal, C-13, Sushant Lok, Phase-I, Gurgaon
High Court
10 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Shri Roop Bansal, C-13, Sushant Lok, Phase-I, Gurgaon
Date of order
10 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Shri Roop Bansal, C-13, Sushant Lok, Phase-I, Gurgaon, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal stands dismissed in default.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 35/2018
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon
----Appellant
Versus
Shri Roop Bansal, C-13, Sushant Lok, Phase-I, Gurgaon,
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Siddharth Bapna for Mr. Anil Mehta
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYAS
Order
10/04/2018
On 14.3.2018 following order was passed:-
“Three week’s time is granted to removethe defects.The matter to come up on 10[th] April,2018.
No further time will be granted.”
Inspite of the above order, defects have not been removed.
The appeal stands dismissed in default.
(VIJAY KUMAR VYAS),J
(K.S.JHAVERI),J
Brijesh 15.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue