Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurugram v. M/S. Nrm Portfolios Pvt. Ltd

High Court 03 May 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurugram v. M/S. Nrm Portfolios Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
03 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurugram v. M/S. Nrm Portfolios Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH [TTA-408-201Decided on: 03.05.2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurugram .... Appellant Vs M/s. NRM Portfolios Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Present:Mr. Kunal Sharma, Sr. Standing Counselfor the appellant-Revenue. >K K AJAY KUMAR MITTAL_J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that sincethe tax effect involved is.=25,18,350/-, he has instructions to withdrawthe present appeal in view of the Circular No.03/2018, dated 11th July,2018, issued by the C.B.D.T., New Delhi. However, he prayed thatliberty be granted to the Revenue to file an application for revival of theappeal in case something survives therein. 2 |Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It 1s,however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the Revenue shallnot be taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further,the legal issue as claimed by the Revenue is being left open to beadjudicated in an appropriate case. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan