Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central,...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central, Jaipur, Jaipur v. Meenakshi Modi, Modi Lane, Sirohi

High Court 24 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central, Jaipur, Jaipur v. Meenakshi Modi, Modi Lane, Sirohi
Date of order
24 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central, Jaipur, Jaipur v. Meenakshi Modi, Modi Lane, Sirohi, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in light of decision ofthis Court in Daksha Jain (supra).

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 156/2018 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central, Jaipur, Jaipur ----Appellant Versus Meenakshi Modi, Modi Lane, Sirohi ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. K. K. Bissa.For Respondent(s): - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA 24/01/2019 Order Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that anappeal preferred by the Revenue against the common order dated21.02.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JodhpurBench, Jodhpur in Income Tax Appeal No.364/JODH/2017 hasalready been dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated30.10.2018 in DB Income Tax Appeal No.148/2018 : Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax Central, Jaipur Vs. DakshaJain and, therefore, in light of said decision the appeal deservesto be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in light of decision ofthis Court in Daksha Jain (supra). (DINESH MEHTA),J (SANGEET LODHA),J 71-A.Arora/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan