Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Jaipur v. M/S Vijaya Shanti Educational Trust, Udaipur

High Court 07 Sep 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

07 Sep 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Jaipur v. M/S Vijaya Shanti Educational Trust, Udaipur, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, this appeal is also dismissed in terms of the judgment referred above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANAT JODHPUR-------------------------------------------------------------- D.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.32/2016 APPELLANT: Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Jaipur Versus RESPONDENT: M/s Vijaya shanti Educational Trust, Udaipur DATE OF JUDGMENT : 07.09.2016 HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR,J.HON'BLE MR. KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA,J. Mr. KK Bissa for the appellantNone present for the respondent BY THE COURT : JUDGMENT ------------ The issue involved in this appeal is no moreres integra in view of judgment given by Division Benchof this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Jodhpur Vs. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Jaisalmer (D.B.Income Tax Appeal No.32/2010, decided on16.1.2015). Accordingly, this appeal is also dismissed in terms of the judgment referred above. (KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA),J. (GOVIND MATHUR),J. Anil Kumar Choudhary

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.