Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central,...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, Jaipur v. Shri Mufat Singh Rao

High Court 27 Aug 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

27 Aug 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, Jaipur v. Shri Mufat Singh Rao, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 106/2018 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus Shri Mufat Singh Rao, 6, Jalam Vilas Scheme, Paota B Road,Jodhpur. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. K.K.Bissa, Mr. G.S.Chouhan & Mr.H.G.ChandaFor Respondent(s): Mr. Anjay Kothari HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA 27/08/2019 Order In view of Circular No.17/2019 (F.No.279/MISC./142/2007-ITJ (PT.) dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board of Director Taxes,Government of India, New Delhi, as clarified vide communicationdated 20.08.2019, the tax effect involved in the present appealbeing less than Rs. 1 crore, learned counsel appearing for theappellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. The permission is granted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (P.K. LOHRA),J (SANGEET LODHA),J 211-RP/-

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.