Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central,...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, Jaipur v. Shri Puna Ram Jangid, G

High Court 07 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

07 Feb 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, Jaipur v. Shri Puna Ram Jangid, G, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 150 / 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-Central, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus Shri Puna Ram Jangid, G-132, Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur. ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : Mr.K.K.Bissa. _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 07/02/2018 In view of the fact that Appeal against the quantum hasalready been dismissed by this court in D.B.Income Tax AppealNo.74/2015 (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur V/sShri Puna Ram Jangid) vide order dated 05.01.2017, therefore, weare not inclined to interfere in this appeal arising out of thepenalty order issued by the assessing authority and rejected bythe CIT (Appeals) and ITAT. As such, this appeal does not involveany substantial question of law. Hence, the same is dismissed. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR) J. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS) J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.