Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. Raghav Ahuja
High Court
30 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. Raghav Ahuja
Date of order
30 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. Raghav Ahuja, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 216 of 2018 (O&M) Decided on : 30.01.2019
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana
Versus
Raghav Ahuja
. . . Appellant(s)
. . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Sr. Standing Counselfor the appellant-revenue(s).
****
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the tax effect involved is ` 30,08,586/-, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal in view of the circular No.03/2018, dated 11[th] July, 2018, issued by the C.B.D.T., New Delhi. However, he prayed that liberty be granted to the revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case something survives therein.
2.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is, however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not be taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legal issue as claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
January 30, 2019
J.Ram
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/NoWhether Reportable: Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.