Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. Ssh. Gian Chand Gupt

High Court 18 Mar 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. Ssh. Gian Chand Gupt
Date of order
18 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. Ssh. Gian Chand Gupt, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAATCHANDIGARH CM No. 3649-CI1[-2016 in/andITA No. 343 of 2014 (O&M)Decided on : 18.03.2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana .. Appellant Versus Ssh. Gian Chand Gupt ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate for the appellant.Ms. Rinku Dahiya, Advocatefor the respondent. ---- AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Notice of this application. 2 At the asking of the Court, Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate, acceptsnotice on behalf of the non-applicant/appellant. 0At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties the main case istaken up for today. 4Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the taxeffect involved in the present is - 1/7,6/7,4, the present appeal be dismissedaS Withdrawn in view of the circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 issued bythe C.B.D.T., New Delhi. However, he prayed that liberty be granted to therevenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case somethingsurvives therein| 5]Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is, however,clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not be taken to beaffirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legal issue as claimedby the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE March 18, 2016smritl (RAJ RAHUL GARG)JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan