Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi -5 v. M/S. Kuber Floritech Ltd
High Court
06 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi -5 v. M/S. Kuber Floritech Ltd
Date of order
06 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi -5 v. M/S. Kuber Floritech Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed on account of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~16
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 1226/2018
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI -5 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC with Ms. Dacchita Sinha, Ms. Anuja Pethia, JSCs & Mr. Nring Chamwibo Zeliang & Ms. Anu Priya Nisha Minz, Advocates.
versus
M/S. KUBER FLORITECH LTD.
.....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R% 06.11.2024
1. The Revenue has filed the present appeal impugning the order dated 17.01.2018 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA
No. 5542/Del/2010 for the assessment year (AY) 1997-98.
2.At the outset, the learned counsel appearing for the Revenue states that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is below the threshold limit of ₹2,00,00,000/- as stipulated in the Circular dated 17.09.2024.
3.Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed on account of low tax effect.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 06, 2024/at
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.