Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-7...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-7 v. Tupperware India Pvt. Ltd

High Court 09 Sep 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-7 v. Tupperware India Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
09 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
2014-2015, 2013-14
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-7 v. Tupperware India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 8.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~68 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 391/2025 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-7 .....Appellant Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC, Mr. Gibran, JSC, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mr. Rishabh Nangia and Mr. Gibran, Advs. Through: versus TUPPERWARE INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Tanya and Mr. Rohit Tiwari, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR O R D E R % 09.09.2025 CM APPL. 56697/2025 1.Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 56698/2025 and CM APPL. 56699/2025 3.For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay of 109 days in filing and 112 days in re-filing, is condoned. filing and 112 days in re-filing, is condoned. 4.The applications are disposed of. ITA 391/2025 5.This appeal by revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(the Act) lays a challenge to an order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No. 8135/Del/2018 filed by the respondent assessee in respect of AY 2014-2015 wherein ITAT has followed its own decision in ITA No. 7580/Del/2017 in respect of respondent assessee for the Assessment Year 2013-14 decided on 01.08.2022. 6.Mr. Puneet Rai, Senior Standing Counsel fairly draws our attention to an order dated 14.03.2024 passed in ITA No. 304/2023 by which the appeal has been dismissed by this Court. Further, Mr. Rai could not point out any perversity in the findings of the ITAT in respect of comparables. 7.In view of the fact that the appeal for the AY 2013-14 has been rejected, this appeal shall also follow the same fate. 8.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J SEPTEMBER 9, 2025 ss VINOD KUMAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan