Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi-I v. Agilis Information Technologies International (I) Pvt. Ltd
High Court
08 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi-I v. Agilis Information Technologies International (I) Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
08 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi-I v. Agilis Information Technologies International (I) Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
1.
+ ITA 907/2015
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-I ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P. Roy Chaudhuri, Senior Standing counsel with Ms. Lakshmi Gurung and Mr. Ishant Goswami, Advocates.
versus
AGILIS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL (I) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Neeraj Jain and Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal, Advocates.
CORAM:JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
%
O R D E R08.02.2016
1. This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 (‘Act’) is against the order dated 26[th] June 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 786/DEL/2015 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2010-11.
2. The notice was issued in this appeal by an order dated 2[nd] December,
2015 confined to the question of treating income/loss on account of foreign
exchange fluctuation as part of the operating revenue/expense.
ITA No. 907/2015
3. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the Assessee that reliance placed by the Revenue on the Safe Harbour Notification dated 18[th]September 2013 will be of no avail to the Revenue since that notice is prospective in nature. It is seen that by the order dated 6[th] January 2016 in ITA No. 17/2016 (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3 v. Fiserv India Pvt. Ltd.), this Court has accepted the above plea of the Assessee. Even otherwise, the decisions referred to by the ITAT in the impugned order on the issue also answer the question in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue.
4. No substantial question of law arises for determination by the Court.
5. The appeal is dismissed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J
FEBRUARY 08, 2016/dn
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.