Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon v. Towers Watson India Pvt. Ltd

High Court 20 Mar 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon v. Towers Watson India Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
20 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon v. Towers Watson India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 79 of 2019 (O&M) Decided on : 20.03.2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon Versus Towers Watson India Pvt. Ltd. . . . Appellant(s) . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL PRESENT: Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Sr. Standing Counsel for the appellant(s). **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) CM No. 1299-CII of 2019 In view of the averments made in the application, which is supported by affidavit of the learned counsel for the applicant-revenue, the delay of 326 days in re-filing the appeal is hereby condoned. CM stands disposed of. CM No. 1300-CII of 2019 Allowed as prayed for. ITA No. 79 of 2019 Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the tax effect involved is `39,82,025/-, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal in view of the circular No.03/2018, dated 11[th] July, 2018, issued by the C.B.D.T., New Delhi. However, he prayed that liberty be granted to the revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case something survives therein. 2.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is, however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not be taken to be ITA No. 79 of 2019 (O&M) affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legal issue as claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE March 20, 2019J.Ram (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/NoWhether Reportable: Yes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan