Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Guwahati, Aayakar Bhawan, Guwahati v. M/S Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. Christian Basti, G.s. Road, Guwahati
High Court
19 Jul 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · asghccis
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Guwahati, Aayakar Bhawan, Guwahati v. M/S Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. Christian Basti, G.s. Road, Guwahati
Date of order
19 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Guwahati, Aayakar Bhawan, Guwahati v. M/S Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. Christian Basti, G.s. Road, Guwahati, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
GAHC010229322021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/205/2023
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GUWAHATI, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, GUWAHATI- 781005.
VERSUS
M/S NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD. CHRISTIAN BASTI, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI- 781005.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S SARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR J ROY
Linked Case :
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VERSUS
M/S NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD. (F)
For the applicant : Mr. S. Chetia, Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department For the respondent : Mr. J. Roy, Senior AdvocateAssisted by Mr. S.S. Roy, Advocate
– B E F O R E –
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
--19072023
This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of delay of 32 days occasioned in filing of the connected appeal.
Heard learned counsel representing the parties.
The grounds set up in the application for condonation of delay appear to begermane. Hence the application is allowed and delay is condoned.
Registry shall number the connected appeal and list for admission after oneweek.
JUDGECHIEF JUSTICE
Comparing Assistant
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.