Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. Mrs. Harjinder Dhiman
High Court
30 Sep 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. Mrs. Harjinder Dhiman
Date of order
30 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. Mrs. Harjinder Dhiman, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH.
340
ITA No. 38 of 2016 (O&M)Date of Decision : 30.09.2019
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh
... Appellant
Versus
Mrs. Harjinder Dhiman|
....Respondent
CQOQRAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate andMr. Ajiteshwar Singh, Advocate for the appellant.Mr. Ajiteshwar Singh, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Manpreet Kanda, Advocate for the respondent.
AJAY TEWARI, J.(ORAL)
1Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since thetaxeffect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed in Circular No.3of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes,further amended vide Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 read withLetter No.F.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated 20.08.2019, he _ hainstructions to withdraw the present appeal. However, he prayed that libertybe granted to the appellant-revenue to file an application for revival of theappeal, in case something survives therein.
?)Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
ITA No. 38 of 2016 (O&M)
3)Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending C.M.,application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(AJAY TEWARIT )JUDGE
30.09.2019pooja sainWhether speaking/reasoned?Whether reportable?
( HARNARESH SINGH GILL )JUDGEVes/NoVes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.