Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Jodhpu...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Jodhpur v. Shri Gaj Singh, Umaid Bhawan Palace, Jodhpur

High Court 08 Nov 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

08 Nov 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Jodhpur v. Shri Gaj Singh, Umaid Bhawan Palace, Jodhpur, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 87/2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Jodhpur. Versus Shri Gaj Singh, Umaid Bhawan Palace, Jodhpur. ----Appellant ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. K.K. Bissa.For Respondent(s): Mr. Ramit Mehta. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR 08/11/2019 Order In view of Circular No.17/2019 [F.No.279/MISC./142/2007-ITJ (PT.)] dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes,Government of India, New Delhi, as clarified vide communicationdated 20.08.2019, the tax effect involved in the present appealbeing less than Rs.1 crore, learned counsel appearing for theappellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. Permission is granted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (SANGEET LODHA),J C/5-DJ/-

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.