Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax I, Ludhiana v. Appel
High Court
26 Apr 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax I, Ludhiana v. Appel
Date of order
26 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax I, Ludhiana v. Appel, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA No.1909 of 201Date of decision: 26.4.2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax I, Ludhiana
Vs.
..--- Appel
M/s B.B.F. Industries Limited|
....Responden
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON’ BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?Present:Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate for the appellant-assessee.Ms. Radhika Suri, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rajni Pal, Advocate,for the respondent.
Ajay Kumar Mittal,J.
For orders, see ITA No.143 of 2015 (Pr. Commissioner ofIncome Tax-l,
Ludhiana vs. M/s B.B.F Industries Limited).
(Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge
April 26, 2016gs"
(Ra} Rahul Garg)Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue