Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. M/S Vardhman Holdings Limited, Ludhiana
High Court
04 Sep 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. M/S Vardhman Holdings Limited, Ludhiana
Date of order
04 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. M/S Vardhman Holdings Limited, Ludhiana, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH.
1236
ITA No. 348 of 2016 (O&M)Date of Decision : 04.09.2019
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana
... Appellant
Versus
M/s Vardhman Holdings Limited, Ludhiana
....Respondent
CQOQRAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present:Mr.Rajesh Katoch, Senior Standing Counsel for|Income Tax Department with|Mr. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu,Junior Standing Counsel for the appellant.
AJAY TEWARI, J.(ORAL)
1Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since thetaxeffect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed in Circular No.3of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes,further amended vide Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 read withLetter No.F.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated 20.08.2019, he _ hainstructions to withdraw the present appeal. However, he prayed that libertybe granted to the appellant-revenue to file an application for revival of theappeal, in case something survives therein.
?)ytDismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
ITA No. 348 of 2016 (O&M)
3)Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending C.M.,application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(AJAY TEWARIT )JUDGE
04.09.2019pooja sain
Whether speaking/reasoned?Whether reportable?
( HARNARESH SINGH GILL )JUDGEVes/NoVes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.