Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-2, Jaipur v. Order
High Court
06 May 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-2, Jaipur v. Order
Date of order
06 May 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-2, Jaipur v. Order, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 15/2021
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-2, Jaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
Smt. Namita Chhabra, 4343, Nathmal Ji Ka Chowk, Johari Bazar,Jaipur Pan-
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Amit Malani, Adv. For Mr. R. B. Mathur, Sr. Advocate
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
06/05/2022
Order
Learned counsel for the appellant would clearly submit thatthe issue raised in this appeal and the question of law proposed,are identical to those which were earlier raised in D.B. Income TaxAppeal No. 22/2021, which has been dismissed by this court videorder dated 06.04.2022 with a finding that no substantial questionof law arises for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid statements made by learned counselfor the appellant and having gone into contents of the appeal,question of law proposed and order dated 06.04.2022 passed bythis court in D. B. Income Tax Appeal No. 22/2021, this appeal isalso dismissed for the reasons recorded therein, without recordingseparate reasons.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.