Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur -...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur -Ii, Jaipur v. Mis Rajasthan Financial Corporation, Udyog Bhawan Tilak Marg, Jaipur

High Court 05 Mar 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur -Ii, Jaipur v. Mis Rajasthan Financial Corporation, Udyog Bhawan Tilak Marg, Jaipur
Date of order
05 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur -Ii, Jaipur v. Mis Rajasthan Financial Corporation, Udyog Bhawan Tilak Marg, Jaipur, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Income Tax Appeal No.59312008 and other connected appeals, the present appeal is liable to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 35612018 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur -Ii, Jaipur ----Appellant Versus MIS Rajasthan Financial Corporation, Udyog Bhawan Tilak Marg, Jaipur >k -&-f E-J-B~ ----Respondent &%: k%. 8-? a-@ -? :*= . @$* y-p." *"- [. ][. ][.-.* ][.- ]For Appellant s,~j biv: Mr. Prateek ~edawaet~r. R.B. K, ... Mathur .j,ai&+ -. : Mr. P.K. Kasliwal For RespQUd2hs) $&& jy .. * P ir HON'BLE MR. NGHDHADDHA 05/03/2020 Appellant has file nging the order dated 16.7.2018 passed by the ellate Tribunal. the present appeal, as framed in the appeal, mstances of the ersely and was ssee cannot .be termed as a company within the meaning of section 2 (18)(a) of the IT Act and provisions of section 115JB are not applicable on the assessee. ?..,a Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the controversy involved in the present case is covered by the decision given in D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.593/2008 (Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur-11 vs. Rajasthan Financial Corporation) and connected appeals decided on 6.7.2017. The appeals filed by the department were dismissed vide order dated 6.7.2017. Since similar appeals have already been dismissed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 6.7.2017 in D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.59312008 and other connected appeals, the present appeal is liable to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed. Briiesh 36.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan