Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S Mahendra Singh Dhankhar Huf, Kh
High Court
07 Apr 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S Mahendra Singh Dhankhar Huf, Kh
Date of order
07 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S Mahendra Singh Dhankhar Huf, Kh, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.The appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 8/2022
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-II, Jaipur.
Versus
----Appellant
M/s Mahendra Singh Dhankhar Huf, Kh-7, Opp. Officer ClubMann Nagar, Jhunjhunu - 333011
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr.Sandeep PathakFor Respondent(s): Mr.Prakul Khurana
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
07/04/2025
Order
1.Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the taxeffect is less than two crores and the appeal is not maintainable.
2.Learned counsel for the appellant submits that at the timewhen the appeal was filed, there was an exception in para 10 ofcircular dated 17.09.2024 to file an appeal where department hadaccepted the audit objection.
3.The Circular 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024 was passed insuppression of Circular 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019. There is noexception carved out for filing an appeal in case involving an auditobjection inspite of low tax effect.
4.The appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.
5.The proposed substantial question of law is kept open.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/43
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.